if the remote share could find server 2's user.pool. So after going over this i guess the problem im having is when i add a remote share on server #1 (the pic below) it doesn't show the Root Share 2 for server 2, just the individual shares. I looked at the Global Settings to see if something needed to be changed but i have never changed these before, in the FileSync Docker i have path 1 and 2 pointing to /mnt for both so last time i went to path 1 \user which list all my shares server 1 and on path 2 i goto remotes and it shows the 2 shares i added individually with "add remote shares" menu under Main Tab Both are linked to /mnt: the remote mount to itself is created when i use the add Root Share, which i assumed means it puts all your shares under one link to avoid having to do individual links to each share of that unraid server and use its Remote Root Share to get all of the shares under one link in freefilesync. The paths you wanted i thought were listed on the pic below freefilesync screenshot above. What paths have you given in the freefilesync template? For remote mounts you might need to give the mounted folder instead of an upper level, and/or edit the path variable and change type to Slave modeĪlso it seems you have a remote mount of itself? What would that be for? Right-clicking in the blank space allows opening other instances. If someone knows a solution ping me in here. As found by below a middle-click will bring up a window list The program can be installed in two versions: as a standard installer on Windows or as a portable application (no registry entries). It also works on 64-bit operating systems on all platforms. In order to start synchronization in batch mode, supply the path of a ffs. To get a syntax overview, open the console, go to the directory where FreeFileSync is installed and type: FreeFileSync -h or FreeFileSync -help. Drag the window a bit to reveal it.Īvoid minimizing the FreeFileSync window as similarly to other containers using this setup there is no way to bring it back. FreeFileSync is a free, open source folder comparison and synchronization software for Windows, Linux, and Mac OS X. FreeFileSync supports additional synchronization scenarios via a command line interface. Notes: If the window does not seem to respond to mouse input it's because FreeFileSync's donation popup was spawned behind the main window. The appdata folder is mapped at /home/freefilesync/appdata and will contain logs, config and can be used to store profiles. path2), be sure to only access things through those, writing somewhere else in the container filesystem would fill your Docker image really quickly. 2 paths can be mapped (presented in the container as /home/freefilesync/path1 resp. This image and template based on gives a FreeFileSync instance through a VNC connection. Therefore, you should apply manual changes only while FreeFileSync is not running. Note that this file is read once when FreeFileSync starts and saved again on exit. It is available on Windows, Linux and macOS. FreeFileSync has a number of special-purpose settings that can only be accessed by manually opening the global configuration file GlobalSettings.xml. Sorry and thank you.FreeFileSync is a free and open-source program used for file synchronization. Please remove the excess posts before this one whoever is moderator. It's really necessary in todays world of LCD's being stuck at one resolution.ĭid not mean to make duplicate posts! So sorry. This factor is rounded to 3 and a 3xBRZ scaling is applied.Ĭan you make it scale evenly with nearest neighbor above the target resolution (in above example, 320 width would end up as 1280), and then start scaling down from there instead? This would provide better quality as the picture would get less blurred getting downscaled with the filter rather than upscaled (not only that but the proportions would be more even for the filter to begin its work) you could scale down to an exact width of 1024 if you add a second lanzcos or cubic filter to prevent distortion.ĭon't understand why emulators and such don't scale this way (correct me if I'm wrong) since picture output would avoid the muddy interpolation that plagues uneven stretches it would look razor sharp instead and not have black borders. if output screen width is 1024 pixel and the raw image with is 320 pixel, then we ideally need a scaling factor of 3.2.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |